Sex and Politics, the TV Show
May 12, 2010, by Christie Healey

The Debates: (L-R) Nick Clegg, David Cameron, Gordon Brown
From “Bigotgate” to shades of Kennedy/Nixon, Christie Healey gives the play-by-play on the recent UK elections
As I sat eating my breakfast this morning, I thought of Mr. Brown. Gordon Brown, a man whose brilliant background in accountancy could not save him from miscalculation of the odds. I imagined him at the 10 Downing Street breakfast table last Friday, the eviction notice hovering in his mind. He must have thought, “Where did I go wrong? He waited years for this gig, suffering in silence while Tony bounced all over the world like Tigger only to be given the old heave ho at the first opportunity.
The last two weeks of the adorably short UK general election campaign have been nothing less than stunning. The changes for Mr. Brown were foretold upon England’s foray into that most American of primetime shows, “The Debates”. Our brusque-toned dour Scot was pitted against the Liberal Democrats’ youthful and articulate leader, Nick Clegg, who puffed deep breaths of fresh air into the stale clichés of British politics. Even the Conservatives’ front man, an urbane and typically toffee-nosed type, managed to look like one of the stars of Mad Men compared to the rumpled, haggard Mr. B.
More modern communication curses were heaped upon Brown’s brow when he learned first hand that an open mic is also deadly weapon. The press-op teatime with Mrs. Duffy, loyal Labour Party housewife, seemed to start out pleasantly, but seizing her righteous 15 minutes she launched into a racist rant against immigrants. Mr. B tried to soothe her with mumbled purrs of campaign speak. On the way back to the car, the real Gordy emerged and he entered into a rant of his own, calling Mrs. Duffy a bigoted woman and heaping scorn upon his handlers, with the mic still clipped to his lapel in the “on” position. The listening press corps experienced mass spontaneous orgasm over “Bigotgate”.
The election resulted in a hung parliament because the magic number of seats that any party has to attain is 326. Despite the expected resurgence of the Conservatives they only got 306, Labour squeaked out 258, the LibDems have 57. Which means that Labour and the Conservatives must woo the LibDems to reach the winning number. Whoever gets to first base with Nick Clegg will be Prime Minister in a coalition government. The LibDems are usually more attracted to the brawny workers of the Labour Party, but that cunning little minx leader of theirs decided to go all the way with Conservative David Cameron who has just become England’s youngest Prime Minister. This is getting more and more like an episode of Mad Men!
In England we say we elect the party, not the person. If you believe that, then I have some amazing old Houses on the banks of the Thames to sell you. Judging from the press reports, no one was prepared for how Kennedy/Nixon the debates were destined to become. Obviously, we do now care very much about the person. Not that an Armani suit, a good haircut and some subtle face-lifting would have saved our single-malt Scot. His fate was sealed with his belief that he was entitled to the job. Note to John McCain: call Gordon, he needs you.
Britain has turned a corner in its political history. There may even be a change in the “first past the post” system to proportional representation. But, if the British political movie-of-the-week becomes an American long-running series, the British public may demand cancellation of the show. By the way, the election may have to be held again later this year and I can’t wait for the new season of Britain’s Got Political Talent. Maybe Simon Cowell will preside over the contestants as they primp and charm their way to victory and who knows, the Labour Party version of Susan Boyle may appear on our screens.




May 12th, 2010 at 2:13 pm
Must remember to turn off the mic, must remember to turn off the mic, must remember….
May 12th, 2010 at 3:47 pm
So much for Britain being more civilized. Apparently, they were not ahead of us in their gentility, but were instead treading water in a kinder, gentler time that America skipped past. So sorry to see that the Brits have now “caught up” with us in our fur-flying, mud-slinging and sometimes heat-packing political free-for-all where words are used as ammunition instead of the means of conveying very real and often helpful concepts. But what good are words when no one is listening? So much better to judge a man–and a woman’s–character by how they look on TV.
May 12th, 2010 at 6:57 pm
At least when Mr. B ranted he was speaking what seems like the truth. Funny how the truth only gets spoken when the mic is supposed to be off. Our own V.P. and our former President and V.P have learned the hard way about the mic.
May 12th, 2010 at 10:16 pm
Those three guys look like they’re ready to be beamed up, Star Trek-like. Didn’t Mr. B learn from Nixon’s errors that sweat and no makeup are a disaster waiting to happen? (Note that his tie is askew.) I do admire the way that the British keep the campaign short and sweet. If only we could follow that lead. And dearpru seems to have forgotten that the English invented the tabloids, and while it may seem oh so polite, the fur and dung has been flying longer and harder across the Pond, until recently that is, as much of the American media and rabid Tea Partyers have caught up with the bad behavior.
May 13th, 2010 at 9:06 am
What’s scarier than three guys in suits telling you they are from the government and are here to help you? Nothing!
May 13th, 2010 at 11:14 am
I’m fascinated at how the new PM’s attempt at building a broad governing coalition eerily mirrors Obama’s oft-repeated campaign promise to bring everyone together for common sense governing. You can’t dialogue with someone who won’t talk to you. It’s not working here. It’ll be interesting to see how it plays out over there.
May 13th, 2010 at 6:46 pm
This was as entertaining as any Vanity Fair Letter from London!